The Telephone Information Sheet for the BFMS British False Memory Society has just been published online via a link on X. It appears that, amongst other things, the people who were felt themselves to be wrongfully accused were asked if their accuser was a feminist or not

Telephone information sheet for the British False Memory Society
They were also asked if the ”accuser” was religious, self harmed or had an eating disorder. They were asked a mysterious question about CTH. I couldn´t figure out what this was at first, but then I worked out that it stood for, ”Courage to Heal” , which was a book that they thought brainwashed people into having false memories of abuse.
It was also a bit disconcerting that they were gleaning information about hospital units and previous mental health hisotry, given they simultaneously asserted that their accusers had NO mental health history prioir to being brainwashed.
No such questions seem to have been asked about ther person claiming to be accused.

This information has been kindly placed online by a former advisory member to the BFMS

It´s attached to an article he has written claiming that,
”It should be remembered that the debate is not actually a war that is harmful in of itself—that was just a metaphor of a fierce debate that sometimes got personal between the debating sides”
Well if I remember right, it was the False Memory people who started the ´war´ analogy.
But why did the BFMS need to collect this kind of personal information in order to have a ”fierce debate”?
The article is by Felstead and Patihis and is called the British False Memory Society: Caseload and details by year (1993 onwards). It¨s published by the British Psychological Society in a journal called Legal and Criminal Psychology